What was the most difficult part of the material for you?
I don't really understand why Theorem 10.1 is important. I can see how it's important to be able to show that you can create a bijective function between to numerically equivalent sets, but I don't see why we need to know that this relation is an equivalence relation.
What was the most interesting part of the material for you?
I completely understand the part from above now! It seems like the point of the theorem is to show that numerical equivalence is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive! It totally makes sense after reading it again.
No comments:
Post a Comment