What was the most interesting part of the material for you?
Theorem 8.3 was interesting to me because that the equivalence classes of R make up a partition of the set R is defined over. It's interesting that equivalence relations have that property.
What was the most difficult part of the material for you?
I had a difficult time understanding why equivalence relations exist that don't exactly have an equation that describes them. I suppose using the definition that we have is the most useful.
No comments:
Post a Comment